Search This Blog

Friday, September 16, 2011

Something for the Creationists to Gag On.

mike large emls

It was the LOW oxygen level of the Mesozoic Era that favored the lung design seen in archosaurs (crocodilians). dinosaurs and birds.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/alligator-lungs/

The 4 chambered heart also evolved in archosaurs to deal with LOW oxygen levels.

http://library.thinkquest.org/C003758/Development/reptile.htm

http://eonsepochsetc.com/Mesozoic/mesozoic_home.html

These same characteristics give birds their endurance and allow them to fly at high altitudes where the air is thin.


It was the LOW oxygen level of the Mesazoic that favored the loss of the lower ribs in mammals and the development of a powerful diaphragm that could pump air in and out of the lungs. This is what allows mammals to gallop, bending their backs in the vertical plane, instead of swinging their asses sideways like lizards.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_mammals#Diaphragm

Miracle Planet Episode 4 Extinction And Rebirth by WhyEvolutionIsTrue
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=B0A559B8D6D2D235

It was the Carboniferous Era that trapped carbon and gave us higher oxygen levels. This produced giant bugs, not dinosaurs or mammals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carboniferous_era#Terrestrial_Invertebrates


*Creationists claim that dinosaurs are just reptiles that grew and changed in response to higher oxygen levels"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yousefa's golden paragraph and other bullshit
by Michael W Gooch on Thursday, January 21, 2010 at 9:41pm
Flavius Josephus is a highly respected and much-quoted Romano-Jewish historian. The early Christians were zealous readers of his work.


A native of Judea, living in the 1st century AD, Josephus was actually governor of Galilee for a time (prior to the war of 70 AD) – the very province in which Jesus allegedly did his wonders. Though not born until 37 AD and therefore not a contemporary witness to any Jesus-character, Josephus at one point even lived in Cana, the very city in which Christ is said to have wrought his first miracle.


Josephus's two major tomes are History of The Jewish War and The Antiquities of the Jews. In these complementary works, the former written in the 70s, the latter in the 90s AD, Josephus mentions every noted personage of Palestine and describes every important event which occurred there during the first seventy years of the Christian era.


At face value, Josephus appears to be the answer to the Christian apologist's dreams.


In a single paragraph (the so-called Testimonium Flavianum) Josephus confirms every salient aspect of the Christ-myth:


1. Jesus's existence 2. his 'more than human' status 3. his miracle working 4. his teaching 5. his ministry among the Jews and the Gentiles 6. his Messiahship 7. his condemnation by the Jewish priests 8. his sentence by Pilate 9. his death on the cross 10. the devotion of his followers 11. his resurrection on the 3rd day 12. his post-death appearance 13. his fulfillment of divine prophesy 14. the successful continuance of the Christians.


In just 127 words Josephus confirms everything – now that is a miracle!




BUT WAIT A MINUTE ...


Not a single writer before the 4th century – not Justin, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Cyprian, Arnobius, etc. – in all their defences against pagan hostility, makes a single reference to Josephus’ wondrous words.


The third century Church 'Father' Origen, for example, spent half his life and a quarter of a million words contending against the pagan writer Celsus. Origen drew on all sorts of proofs and witnesses to his arguments in his fierce defence of Christianity. He quotes from Josephus extensively. Yet even he makes no reference to this 'golden paragraph' from Josephus, which would have been the ultimate rebuttal. In fact, Origen actually said that Josephus was "not believing in Jesus as the Christ."


Origen did not quote the 'golden paragraph' because this paragraph had not yet been written.


It was absent from early copies of the works of Josephus and did not appear in Origen's third century version of Josephus, referenced in his Contra Celsum.



REALITY CHECK


In fact, the Josephus paragraph about Jesus does not appear until the beginning of the fourth century, at the time of Constantine.


Bishop Eusebius, that great Church propagandist and self-confessed liar-for-god, was the first person known to have quoted this paragraph of Josephus, about the year 340 AD. This was after the Christians had become the custodians of religious correctness.



http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/josephus-etal.html#dennis
Like ·  · Share · Delete
Michael W Gooch Acts 5:30 (Young's Literal Translation)


30and the God of our fathers did raise up Jesus, whom ye slew, having hanged upon a tree;


http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+5%3A30&version=YLT


This passage reveals an oversight on the author's part. While the real sage known as Jesus was hanged from a tree after being stoned to death his portrayal on a cross is a representation of the zodiac axis. And note that the 12 disciples are simply the 12 signs of the zodiac.
January 30, 2010 at 10:19pm · Like
Michael W Gooch Yeshu the sorcerer


Sanhedrin 43a relates the trial and execution of Yeshu and his five disciples. Here, Yeshu is a sorcerer who has enticed other Jews to apostasy. A herald is sent to call for witnesses in his favour for forty days before his execution. No one comes forth and in the end he is stoned and hanged on the Eve of Passover. His five disciples, named Matai, Nekai, Netzer, Buni, and Todah are then tried. Word play is made on each of their names, and they are executed. It is mentioned that leniency could not be applied because of Yeshu's influence with the royal government (malkhut).
January 30, 2010 at 10:26pm · Like






The meaning of crucifixion
by Michael W Gooch on Thursday, January 21, 2010 at 10:21pm
Crucifixion refers to something or someone being mounted or affixed to a cross. The method of execution whereby a criminal was affixed to a TAU or X shaped frame might have been referred to as crucifixion. In some cases the person may have been hung from a cross shape. This might have been a type of human sacrifice where a criminal was symbolically affixed to a cross representing the axis of the zodiac. It would be fitting if the victim was a holy man. This might apply to the rituals honoring the Celtic forest god Esse or the Story of Shiva who was impaled on a tree by an arrow.


It is incredibly mis-leading when the Zeitgeist crew refer to Horus being crucified. Horus may have been depicted on the axis of the zodiac but none of his stories have him dying by crucifixion. He was however immaculately conceived though Isis' status as a virgin is un-proveable. His father Osiris was betrayed and murdered by Seth then ressurected by Isis. After she re-assembled his body she could not find his phallus so she crafted one out of clay then made love to him.


ON the Winter Solstice the sun sets in the vicinity of the Southern Cross. There are three days where it rises and sets in the same place with no visible movement north. This is likely the origin of the death and resurrection stories common in the near East.




On a side note...


Human sacrifice in ancient meso america mirrors the middle eastern stories in alot of ways.


Life is because of the gods; with their sacrifice they gave us life [...]. They produce our sustenance [...] which nourishes life.[10]


Victims were considered God incarnate and there bodies were eaten afterwords mirroring the communion of christianity but in a much more realistic way.


During the 20-day month of Toxcatl, a young impersonator of Tezcatlipoca would be sacrificed. Throughout a year, this youth would be dressed as Tezcatlipoca and treated as a living incarnation of the God. The youth would represent Tezcatlipoca on earth; he would get four beautiful women as his companions until he met his destiny, in the meantime he walked through the streets of Tenochtitlan playing a flute. On the day of the sacrifice a feast would be held in Tezcatlipoca's honor. The young man would climb the pyramid, break his flute and surrender his body to the priests. SahagĂșn compared it to the Christian Easter.[21]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sacrifice_in_Aztec_culture
Like ·  · Share · Delete
Michael W Gooch Here are some Yahoo answers concerning the theology of the emacualtely coceived god incarnate Horus.


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090331070958AA4kWid
January 30, 2010 at 8:38pm · Like




Jesus
by Michael W Gooch on Sunday, January 24, 2010 at 6:23pm
Mark 14:12-14 (Young's Literal Translation)


12And the first day of the unleavened food, when they were killing the passover, his disciples say to him, `Where wilt thou, [that,] having gone, we may prepare, that thou mayest eat the passover?'


13And he sendeth forth two of his disciples, and saith to them, `Go ye away to the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water, follow him;


14and wherever he may go in, say ye to the master of the house -- The Teacher saith, Where is the guest-chamber, where the passover, with my disciples, I may eat?


This passage is a reference to the dawning of the Age of Aquarias, what we would refer to as 2150-4300. In this age Aquarius will be behind the Sun on the Vernal Equinox. Hear is a picture of the "Water Bearer" superimposed on his constellation.


http://kimolsen.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/aquarius.gif




The early christians had no problem understanding that the new era (1 BCE - 2150 BCE) was the Age of Pisces Just as the exodus represented the change from the Age of Taurus (the golden calf) to the Age of Aries. Thought not mentioned on this page the two fish with which Jesus fed the masses represent the two fish in the constellation of Pisces.


Pisces.http://www.jordanmaxwell.com/articles/religion/religion2.html




The zoomorphic form of the Codex Borgianus, from 15th-century Mexico.It represents the 'Crucified Saviour of the New World.' The Spanish monks who first went to Mexico were surprised to find the crucifix there and discovered it to be a representation of the death of Quetzalcoatl.


http://www.jordanmaxwell.com/images/aaa-ac/aztec_savior.gif

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.thelocal.se/27480/20100628/

Swedish scholar: 'Jesus was not crucified'

Published: 28 Jun 10 10:52 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/27480/20100628/

A Swedish theologian has claimed that Jesus may not have have been crucified as there is no evidence to indicate that the Romans crucified prisoners 2,000 years ago.
Swedish king exhumed to solve grave mystery (12 Apr 11)
How to give the perfect presentation to Swedes (11 Apr 11)
Reinfeldt declines Juholt debate challenge (10 Apr 11)
According to Gunnar Samuelsson of Gothenburg University, the story of Jesus' execution is based on Christian traditions and artistic illustrations, not antique texts, according to a recently published doctoral thesis entitled "Crucifixion in Antiquity - An Inquiry into the Background of the New Testament Terminology of Crucifixion".

Samuelsson, a committed Christian, alleges the Bible has been misinterpreted, saying there are no explicit references to the use of nails or to crucifixion - only that Jesus bore a "staurus" towards Calvary, which can also mean "pole," his research states.

Samuelsson 400-page thesis is based on close study of the original texts and was submitted at the university last month.

"The problem is descriptions of crucifixions are remarkably absent in the antique literature," Samuelsson said in an interview with the UK Daily Telegraph. "The sources where you would expect to find support for the established understanding of the event really don't say anything."

Ancient Greek, Latin and Hebrew literature from Homer to the first century describe a number of suspension punishments, but none mention "crosses" or "crucifixion."

"Consequently, the contemporary understanding of crucifixion as a punishment is severely challenged," Samuelsson told the newspaper. "And what's even more challenging is the same can be concluded about the accounts of the crucifixion of Jesus. The New Testament doesn't say as much as we'd like to believe."

There is little evidence to suggest that Jesus was left to die after being nailed to a cross, both in ancient pre-Christian and extra-Biblical literature as well as the Bible.

Samuelsson admitted that it is easy to react emotionally instead of logically to the research that is so close to the heart of his faith. He added that the actual execution texts do not describe how Jesus was attached to the execution device.

"This is the heart of the problem. The text of the passion narratives is not that exact and information loaded, as we Christians sometimes want it to be," Samuelsson explained.

"If you are looking for texts that depict the act of nailing persons to a cross you will not find any beside the Gospels."

Contemporary literature all use the same vague terminology, including those in Latin. Meanwhile, the Latin word "crux" does not necessarily refer to a cross, nor patibulum refer to a cross-beam.

But despite the findings of his research Samuelsson does not suggest that Christians should reject of doubt the biblical and argued that believed that Jesus was indeed the son of God and argued that there is strong documented evidence to show that "a man named Jesus existed in that part of the world and in that time".

"My suggestion is that we should read the text as it is, not as we think it is. We should read on the lines, not between the lines. The text of the Bible is sufficient. We do not need to add anything," he told the newspaper.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm no atheist. Atheism is just another alternative fairy tale. It's the controlled oppostion to religion in the same way that the democrats are the controlled opposition to the republicans and vice/versa. Atheism is the poison in the well of truth where spirituality is concerned in the same way that alex jones and texx mars are where conspiracy research is concerned. So enjoy the video but be ready to be offended

What kind of nation do you get when 8 our of every 10 people believe in fairy tales as if they were reality?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlXkjrluq_4&feature=share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFUTING MISSIONARIES
http://mama.indstate.edu/users/nizrael/jesusrefutation.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, September 12, 2011

9/11 Who Benefitted?

Once you accept that there can be one group of people willing to commit acts of terror you must accept that there can be a second group equally willing to commit acts of terror to blame on the first group.


Stop and think for a minute. Do the acts of terror accomplish anything for the group that is blamed for the terror?


Does terror achieve their ends or obtain the results they want? Or isn't it obvious that the acts of terror are actually achieving the objectives of those who claim to be the victims of the terror, to gain them sympathy and political alliances?


History is full of rulers who used fake terror on their own populations to create consent for their policies. The US is known to have actually planned fake terror to create support for an invasion of Cuba. And, it is now well established that FDR not only allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor to happen, but goaded the Japanese into it to get a reluctant US into WWII.
Then there is the infamous "Lavon Affair" in which Israelis bombed British and American targets and left evidence to frame Arabs. According to ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky, Israel suckered the US into attacking Libya with fake radio messages.


The US told other nations as early as March 2001 of a plan to invade Afghanistan in October 2001. Isn't it interesting that the "terrorists" struck on 9-11, perfectly in time to create the public anger Bush needed to carry out the already-planned already-announced war?


Who is running Al Qaeda? Who benefits from their activities?


Bush got his oil war...


...and Sharon got a green light to kill Palestinians and steal their land.


Who really benefits? That's who is running Al Qaeda.




http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/goldstein.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


On the 9/11 anniversary, Americans would do well to turn their attention away from the mawkish nonsense spouted by their politicians and mainstream media and take a look at what is really going on in the world under the boot of the Washington regime in places like Bahrain. Understanding that would be a far more fitting tribute to the victims of 9/11 and to the many more innocent victims that have followed since that date.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26476















Some Notes on 9/11 and the Scare Tactics of Western Governments

My 9/11 Theory

Islamic fundamentalism has nothing to do with terrorism. Wife beating, public execution, ignorance yes; Terrorism no! The taliban is a religious group but they are not terrorists. Al Qaeda is a drug cartel nothing more. They were simply continuing the Mena, Arkansas smuggling work of the CIA but based in Florida with huffman aviation as a cover. It seems likely that Mossad agents, believing that they were participating in a drill or possibly responding to what they believed was a real hijacking, seized control of the planes and handed over their flight controls to an on the ground cadre of mossad technicians believing that the planes would be landed safely by remote control. Instead the crew on the ground flew them into targets. Operation Vigilant Guardian would have provided cover and since israel has penetrated every level of government they could have arranged for all fighter jets to be out of reach. It could have taken less than ten mossad thugs (plus the traitor dick cheney) who knew what was going on to pull this off. Flight 77 probably made it's loop while the ground crew was deciding on a target after realizing that flight 93 was about to be shot down by American fighters.


Phony conspiracy theories

http://www.dcmilitary.com/dcmilitary_archives/stories/112901/12279-1.shtml

*******************************************************************************




9/11 was a mossad hit. The technology to remotely guide an airplane to a target is decades old. Additionally flight 77 made a circle before hitting the Pentagon (probably deciding which becon to follow) then performed a maneuver that could only be accomplished with fly by wire technology making fine adjustments of the flaps every few milliseconds. This IS impossible for humans;Our reflexes are too slow. Additionally the Pentagon and CIA are thoroughly infested with dual israeli citizens working for mossad.


Al Qaeda is a drug cartel nothing more. They were simply continuing the Mena, Arkansas smuggling work of the CIA but based in Florida with huffman aviation as a cover. It seems likely that Mossad agents, believing that they were participating in a drill or possibly responding to what they believed was a real hijacking, seized control of the planes and handed over their flight controls believing that the planes would be landed safely by remote control. However they could have been tricked into putting the planes under the command of beacons in the WTC and Pentagon. 


Operation Vigilant Guardian would have provided cover and since israel has penetrated every level of government they could have arranged for all fighter jets to be out of reach. It could have taken less than ten mossad thugs (plus the traitor dick cheney) who knew what was going on to pull this off. 



Unocal tried to negotiate a deal with the taliban to allow them to construct a pipeline from Turkmenistan through western Afghanistan to Pakistan. A deal couldn't be reached so the next option was to invade.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAD201A.html


Bill Cooper predicted 9/11.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ERTsWzbGXg


Susan Lindauer was arrested and committed for having foreknowledge of the attack. She wasn't a conspirator and in fact tried to stop it.

http://extremeprejudiceusa.wordpress.com/

http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/archives.php?stream=%2Fdeadline%2Fdeadline.2011-01-13_16k.mp3

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This movie does a good analysis:

The New American Century
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3776750618788792499#

Who Killed John O'Neil?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCFWcKVeWUE

War by Deception 2011 (Full Movie) Dismantling the Hidden American Enemies
Ask yourself, "What is more likely? Were we attacked by fundamentalist muslims because they hate our freedom despite indulging in it?" or "Did certain people with an interest in profiting from the Afghan pipeline frame the Taliban by staging an attack to be used as an excuse for an invasion?". You already know the truth. You just need to admit it to yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTx5R67slS0

NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o


THE CONQUEST OF AFGHANISTAN BEGAN BEFORE 9/11

The war on Afghanistan was sold to the public as a reaction to the attacks on 11 September 2001. However, the war was planned before the infamous 9/11 disaster, and the military action began long before the World Trade Center fell.

The conquest of Afghanistan had been planned since at least 12 February 1998, and 9/11 happened just in time to secure public support for the attacks.

http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/afghanistan.asp


A Satire of the 9/11 Conspiracy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=85FgxBkmdoo#!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael F Rivero
BULL BISCUITS! In theory there were an unknown number of airplanes flying over the nation crashing into buildings, Bush's presence at the school had been announced in the media three days before, and there is an airport just 4 miles from that school. Yet Bush's calm, and more to the point the inactivity of the Secret Service proves they knew Bush wasn't a target that day, which means they knew in advance what the targets would be.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/28/us-sept11-bush-idUSTRE76R7YJ20110728?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%29
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Iran collaberating with the US and israel sponsoring terror covertly while threatening one another publicly.

Public enemies, private friends

That is precisely what happened in Bosnia in the early 1990s...

http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/deja.htm
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/seale.htm

Iran is Working with the US in Iraq

If the U.S. has hostile intentions towards Iran, shouldn't someone tell the Iranians?

http://www.emperors-clothes.com/docs/helping.htm

http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/seale.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CARL VINSON AIRCRAFT CARRIERS

Could the US be planning on sinking the USS Enterprise CVN 65 and blaming it on Iran? It will save them the money on scrapping it and provide an excuse to invade Iran. This ship is nearing the end of it's life and like the WTC it will be expensive to scrap. The WTC had asbestos. The CVN65 has 8 nuclear reactors.

http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/03/26/why-have-we-moved-2-aircraft-carriers-to-the-gulf-of-hormuz/

This story is 3 months old but there is another story from an unreliable source concerning warships around Syria that may also be a motive for a similar false flag op.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/us-warships-moved-to-syrian-coast.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Rather than create a new note I want to elaborate on the lack of a connection between islam and terror here.


http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/03/egypt-4000-muslims-chanting-allahu-akbar-torch-church-attack-christian-homes.html
Notice how these stories start turning up when westerners start viewing muslims as humans. I call bullshit! IF this happened at all it's a CIA/mossad/MI6 job just like this:


http://rupeenews.com/?p=36041
This looks like a false flag to build US public support for action in Pakistan since XE got caught spying there for western corporate interests.


http://www.coptsunited.com/Details.php?I=383&A=3164
The army, which has been maintaining security in Egypt since police disappeared during anti-regime protests last month, managed to put the fire out and restore calm to the area, the official said. 


I wanna clarify. I'm not defending islam. My point is that most people don't let their religion trump common sense. I'm defending the ability of humans (including muslims) common to be decent in spite of their doctrines. Here is an example: "Terrorized Copts have fled and some hid in homes of Muslim neighbors,"... Muslims hiding Christians while the mob riots.




There was some feuding between the families. After that died down there were funerals for the dead. After that a group of muslims rioted and burned some churches. Wonder how many of the rioters were even involved in the original feud. I'm guessing not many. I'm guessing that CIA agitators sought out troublemakers and criminals and stirred them up.



http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/09/al-qaeda-trying-to-radicalize-u-s-muslims-congressman-claims/


See how this is carefully timed to counter the empathy that Americans and middle easterners feel for one another in their struggles against oppressive governments. There is no point in this witch hunt. There hasn't been a terrorist attack in years and terrorism is a tool of megalomaniacs not religious extremists anyway.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=3109


Today's 'Islamic Fascists' Were Yesterday's Friends

By Brendan O'Neill

Global Research, August 31, 2006
Antiwar.com

According to President George W. Bush, America is at war with "Islamic fascists." Commentators who support Bush's military interventions also argue that the West faces new religious enemies who do not play by the old rules of warfare. Hezbollah (which literally translates as "Party of God") says its wants to obliterate Israel, and Hamas (an abbreviation of "Islamic Resistance Movement") has taken the reins of power in Gaza and the West Bank; meanwhile, al-Qaeda and its associates continue to carry out sporadic, scrappy attacks designed to restore the Islamic caliphate. All of this has led one British newspaper columnist to argue that there is a new "World War being waged by clerical fascism against free societies."
In a nutshell, the wars over state, territory, and politics that defined the Cold War era have given way to cosmic battles between "good" and "evil" – between a West apparently keen to defend secular, democratic values and its twisted opponents who prefer the idea of autocratic Islam.
This simplistic view of the new geopolitical landscape is deeply problematic. It overlooks the key role that the West played in nurturing radical Islamist groups, precisely as a means of isolating and undermining secular movements that were judged by Western governments to be too uppity or dangerous. Over the past 80 years and more – from Egypt to Afghanistan to Palestine – powerful governments in the West and their allies in the Middle East helped to create radical Islamic sects as a bulwark against secular nationalist parties or pan-Arabism. They gave the nod to, and in some instances funded and armed, Islamist movements that might challenge the claims of local anti-colonial, liberationist, or communistic outfits.
In other words, there is a deep and bitter irony in the West's current claims to be standing up to evil religious sects in the name of universal values. It was precisely the West's earlier disregard for secularism and democracy in the Middle East, its elevation of its own powerful interests over the needs and desires of local populations, which helped to give rise to a layer of apparently "evil" radical Islamism. What we have today is not a World War between a principled West and psychotic groups from "over there," but rather the messy residue of decades of Western meddling in the Middle East.
Duplicitous Western support for Islamist movements has a long and dishonorable history. In the early and middle 20th century, both British and U.S. intelligence supported the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, the group from which so many of today's radical Islamic sects – including Hamas and even al-Qaeda – have sprung. Indeed, in the 1920s, the British, then the colonial rulers of Egypt, helped to set up the Muslim Brotherhood as a means of keeping Egyptian nationalism and anti-colonialism in check. The immediate precursor to the Muslim Brotherhood was an organization called the Society of Propaganda and Guidance, which attacked Egyptian nationalists – who wanted British forces out of Egypt – as "atheists and infidels." Under British patronage, the Society set up the Institute of Propaganda and Guidance, which brought Islamists from across the Muslim world to Egypt so they could be trained in political agitation, and then take such anti-anti-colonialism back to their own homelands., which was funded and backed by British colonialists. In return, the Society provided Islamist backing to British rule in Egypt. It published a journal called 
One graduate of the Institute of Propaganda and Guidance was Hassan al-Banna, who founded the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928. According to Robert Dreyfuss, in his informative book Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam, the original Muslim Brotherhood was an "unabashed British intelligence front." The mosque that served as the first headquarters of the Brotherhood – in Ismailia, Egypt – was built by the (British) Suez Canal Company. With Britain's knowledge, and tacit approval, in the 1930s and '40s the Brotherhood both challenged anti-colonial parties within Egypt and also spread to other parts of the Near and Middle East, setting up branches in Transjordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine.
Following the coming to power of the anti-colonialist and pan-Arabist Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1954, elements in the West continued to look upon the Muslim Brotherhood as a weapon against secular nationalism and communism. The British government of the time encouraged the Brotherhood to challenge Nasser, and in 1954 there was open conflict between the Brotherhood's and Nasser's forces. Many hundreds were killed, and eventually the Brotherhood fled, taking refuge in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and other states in the Anglo-American camp. The U.S.-friendly regime in Saudi Arabia, in particular, provided sanctuary and financial backing to Brotherhood members during Nasser's crackdown on the group.
Initially the U.S., in its interventionist policies of the postwar period, adopted the British model of supporting radical Islamists in order to undermine popular secular governments or communist-influenced outfits in the Near and Middle East. This included supporting the Brotherhood against Nasser. In his bookSleeping With the Devil, former CIA officer Robert Baer said there was a "dirty little secret" in Washington in the early 1950s:
"The White House looked on the Brothers as a silent ally, a secret weapon against – what else? – communism. The covert action started in the 1950s with the Dulles brothers – Allen at the CIA and John Foster at the State Department – when they approved Saudi Arabia's funding of Egypt's Brothers against Nasser. As far as Washington was concerned, Nasser was a communist."
Baer said that the "logic of the Cold War" meant that the U.S. was willing to support radical Islamists even if they carried out activities such as assassinations or political agitation designed to foment conflict. As Baer argues, "If Allah agreed to fight on our side, fine. If Allah decided that political assassination was permissible, that was fine too, as long as no one talked about it in polite company." (There was, of course, a subsequent divergence between British and American policy on Nasser. During the Suez crisisof 1956, President Dwight Eisenhower put a stop to the British-French-Israeli invasion of Suez and backed Nasser's regime, temporarily at least.)
The Muslim Brotherhood and its various branches across the Middle East – which shared the aim of replacing secular democracy with Islamic government – also gave rise to violent splinter groups. Hamas, which today is discussed by Bush and his supporters as a great danger to peace in Israel-Palestine, if not the entire world, is a local wing of the Brotherhood, formed in the mid-1980s from various Brotherhood-affiliated charities that had gained a foothold in Palestinian territories. Al-Qaeda itself has been influenced primarily by the thinking of Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966), a radical member of the Brotherhood. Osama bin Laden's deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, an Egyptian, was first radicalized by the Muslim Brotherhood; he joined the group when he was 14 years old, before moving on to the more radical Islamic Jihad group in 1979 and subsequently fighting against the Soviets in Afghanistan.
Indeed, during the Afghan-Soviet war from 1979 to 1992, American and British intelligence once again supported radical Islamists against, in this instance, secularist and communist forces. Where the Cold War began with America and Britain supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical Islamists against popular secular movements, it ended with America and Britain arming, financing, and propagandizing on behalf of radical Islamists fighting the Soviet Union's last stand in Afghanistan before its collapse in the early 1990s.
Throughout the 1980s, the CIA and the British intelligence organization MI5 arranged for the arming and training of thousands of mujahedeen in Afghanistan. American and British elements, together with Saudi Arabia and the Pakistani intelligence service ISI, ensured that the mujahedeen had everything they needed to wage war against the Soviets. As Phil Gasper has argued,
"The CIA became the grand coordinator: purchasing or arranging the manufacture of Soviet-style weapons from Egypt, China, Poland, Israel, and elsewhere, or supplying their own; arranging for military training by Americans, Egyptians, Chinese and Iranians; hitting up Middle-Eastern countries for donations, notably Saudi Arabia, which gave many hundreds of millions of dollars in aid each year, totaling probably more than a billion; pressuring and bribing Pakistan – with whom recent American relations had been very poor – to rent out its country as a military staging area and sanctuary; putting the Pakistan Director of Military Operations, Brigadier Mian Mohammad Afzal, onto the CIA payroll to ensure Pakistani cooperation."
Two beneficiaries of such widespread American support for the mujahedeen's war against the Soviets were bin Laden and Zawahiri, currently al-Qaeda's number 1 and number 2. Both traveled to Afghanistan and Pakistan in the 1980s to assist with the anti-Soviet war effort. It should be noted that America and Britain did not only fund and arm the mujahedeen; they also provided backing to mosques, madrassa schools, and propagandistic publications and radio stations that put the case for political Islam over communism or secularism. Indeed, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed – who would go on to devise the 9/11 attacks – was involved in a madrassa school that was funded by Saudi and U.S. money. Once again, Western forces were not only opportunistically supporting their enemy's enemy – they were also fueling the idea that radical Islamism was preferable to "evil" communism and even to secular government.
We could argue that al-Qaeda, both intellectually and practically, is a product of Western meddling in Middle Eastern affairs. It takes its inspiration from the Muslim Brotherhood, that group supported by both American and British intelligence in the early and middle 20th century, and it was forged in the heat of the Afghan-Soviet war, that conflict largely facilitated by U.S., British, and Saudi funds and arms. In terms of both its political origins and its early and formative fighting experiences, al-Qaeda owes a great deal to Western interventionism.
Even Hamas is, in some ways, the product of a desire by the West and its allies to use radical Islamism as a counterweight to popular secular movements. It was formed, in 1987, from various charities with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. These charities had been allowed by Israel itself to gain strength and influence in Palestinian territories in order to, as one account puts it, "counter the influence of the secular Palestinian resistance movements." Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, the spiritual leader of Hamas, who was killed by an Israeli air strike in 2004, formed the military outfit in 1987 as the armed wing of his group the Islamic Association. This organization had been licensed by Israel 10 years earlier, in the 1970s. In that period, Israeli officials gave the nod to, and even indirectly funded, the setting-up of Islamic societies in the West Bank and Gaza that might weaken and isolate Yasser Arafat's Palestine Liberation Organization. Martha Kessler, a senior analyst for the CIA, has said: "[W]e saw Israel cultivate Islam as a counterweight to Palestinian nationalism." The very Islamic groups "cultivated" by Israel in the 1970s went on to become Hamas in the 1980s.
In funding Islamists against secularists, Israel was following in a long tradition started by the British and Americans. As one former senior CIA official has put it, Israel's tolerance, even support, of Islamic groups that would later become Hamas "was a direct attempt to divide and dilute support for a strong, secular PLO by using a competing religious alternative." There is no evidence that Israel ever supported Hezbollah, but their interests have coincided over the past two decades or more, since the founding of Hezbollah in Lebanon by Iranian elements in 1982.
As Strategic Forecasting Inc., or Stratfor, has argued, "Hezbollah represented a militant, non-secular alternative to [Arafat's] Nassertie Fatah, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other groups that took their bearing from Pan-Arabism rather than Islam…. [Hezbollah] made a powerful claim that the Palestinian movement had no future while it remained fundamentally secular." Israel and Hezbollah are, of course, arch-rivals; Hezbollah was formed with the explicit aim of expelling Israel from Lebanon by any means necessary. However, in the early 1980s both Israel and Hezbollah had a shared aim of weakening the more powerful and popular secularist Palestinian movements.
Over the past 80 years, Western governments and their allies have supported radical Islamist groups. However, this was not merely opportunism, a bad case of "my enemy's enemy is my friend." As part of this process, Western governments seriously denigrated popular secular and democratic movements. Indeed, from the founding of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1920s to Israel's role in the forging of Hamas in the 1980s, the explicit aim of Western support for radical Islamism was to isolate, weaken, and ultimately destroy popular political movements that very often were based on Western ideas of democracy and progress. Thus, many of these radical Islamist groups – the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, al-Qaeda, Hezbollah – have a built-in suspicion of and hostility toward secular democracy.
What we are faced with today is not a new World War being waged by any kind of powerful Islamist conspiracy. Instead, as secular and nationalist politics has fallen apart in the post-Cold War period, we are left with fairly small, radical Islamist sects – in other words, with those very groups that were forged as a bulwark against secular democratic politics in the first place.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com 

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

© Copyright Brendan O'Neill, Antiwar.com, 2006 

The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=3109

© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2007


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Could the US be planning on sinking the USS Enterprise CVN 65 and blaming it on Iran? It will save them the money on scrapping it and provide an excuse to invade Iran. This ship is nearing the end of it's life and like the WTC it will be expensive to scrap. The WTC had asbestos. The CVN65 has 8 nuclear reactors 
http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/03/26/why-have-we-moved-2-aircraft-carriers-to-the-gulf-of-hormuz/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 IRAN WILL BE NUCLEAR BY...

Published on June 15, 1992, Press-Telegram (Long Beach, CA)


JERUSALEM - Military and political action may be needed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, Israel's air force chief said Sunday. Maj. Gen. Herzl Budinger told Israel television that if Iran's intensive effort to develop atomic weapons isn't disrupted'' the fundamentalist Islamic nation would become a nuclear power by the end of the decade.


Press-Telegram (Long Beach, CA) DIGEST: ISRAEL HINTS AT ATTACK ON IRAN NUCLEAR PROGRAM


 http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=LB&p_theme=lb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAE8DD2A0B53FFA&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date%3AD&s_trackval=GooglePM


http://www.bannination.com:8080/comments/5036377/c1126722