Search This Blog

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Retired NY Supreme Court Justice Karen Smith Roughed up by Cops for Intervening in Brutal Beating of ‘Occupy’ Protester’s Mom

http://morallowground.com/2011/11/17/retired-ny-supreme-court-justice-karen-smith-roughed-up-by-cops-for-intervening-in-brutal-beating-of-occupy-protesters-mom/



Retired NY Supreme Court Justice Karen Smith Roughed up by Cops for Intervening in Brutal Beating of ‘Occupy’ Protester’s Mom

17th November 2011   ·   5 Comments
A retired New York state Supreme Court justice was shoved into a wall by NYPD officers after she intervened in an attempt to stop officers from brutally beating the mother of an ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protester on Tuesday morning.
Judge Karen Smith told Democracy Now! that she was working as a legal observer for the National Lawyers Guild, immediately identifiable as such by her day-glo neon green hat, when she witnessed a shocking incident of police brutality.
Judge Smith (Photo: NY State Unified Court System)
“I was there to take down the names of people who were arrested,” she explained. “As I’m standing there, an African-American woman goes up to a police officer and says, ‘I need to get in. My daughter’s there, I want to know if she is OK.’ And he said, ‘Move on, lady,’ and they kept pushing with their sticks, pushing back and she was crying… he throws her to the ground and starts hitting her in the head.”
Smith knew she had to do something to stop the horrific attack.
“I walk over and I say, ‘Look, cuff her if she’s done something, but you don’t need to do that.’ He said, ‘lady, you want to get arrested?’ I said, ‘Do you see my hat? I’m here as a legal observer.’ He said, ‘Do you want to get arrested?’ and he pushed me up against the wall.”
Sadly, such brutality is all too common across the nation as police resort to heavy-handed tactics to deal with overwhelmingly peaceful ‘Occupy’ protesters. In Seattle, 84-year-old Dorli Rainey, a former mayoral candidate who stands all but 4’10″ (1.47 m), was attacked with chemical weapons on Monday. She wasn’t alone; a priest and a pregnant teen were among the many peaceful protesters who were pepper sprayed. The pregnant girl required hospitalization.
“My problem is not only with police brutality, it is with the progressive getting worse attitude of the police,” Rainey, who grew up in Nazi Germany, told Democracy Now!  ”I was tear-gassed… in Seattle when the WTO was there in Seattle. And I also was in a workshop with Arundhati Roy when she was in Seattle for theWTO. These locations, while they were pretty violent outside, were not nearly as bad as what we see now. It is getting progressively worse. Our freedoms are getting curtailed. And I just listened to the press being banned at Wall Street—this in a country where we export our sort of democracy all over the world at gunpoint.”
Rainey appeared on Current TV’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann last night, where she said implored people to stand up for what’s right and to ”take one more step out of your comfort zone.” “It would be so easy to say, ‘Well I’m going to retire, I’m going to sit around, watch television or eat bonbons,’ but somebody’s got to keep ’em awake and let ’em know what is really going on in this world,” she said.

No one is immune from police brutality as the ruling class circles the wagons and dispatches its gatekeepers (the police) to crush the ‘Occupy’ uprising. No one. Not old ladies, not military veterans who fought the one percent’s wars against poor people in far-flung lands. On two separate occasions, two War on Terror vets were hospitalized with life-threatening injuries after police in Oakland, California violently attacked ‘Occupy’ demonstrators. On October 25, former Marine and Iraq War veteran Scott Olsen was shot by a police projectile that fractured his skulland sent him to the intensive care unit with a swollen brain. Days later, Kayvan Sabehgi, a former Army Ranger and veteran of both the Iraq and Afghan wars, was brutally beaten by police in downtown Oakland. He ended up on the operating table with a lacerated spleen after being denied proper medical attention for the better part of an entire day.
Nearby, peaceful and unarmed students at the University of California, Berkeley were attacked by riot police on their own campus.
It’s not just protesters who have been brutalized and arrested. New York City Councilman Ydanis Rodriguez was beaten bloody and arrested at Tuesday’s violent ‘Occupy Wall Street’ eviction in Lower Manhattan. Also arrested was Paul Newell, the Democratic District Leader for New York’s 64th Assembly District.

And chillingly, journalists have also been targeted for beatings and arrest for nothing more than doing their jobs. NYPD officers told reporters that “you’re not press tonight” as they roughed up and arrested employees of NPR, theNew York Times, the New York Post, NBC and other outlets big and small after the powers-that-be decided to black out media access to the Zuccotti Park/Liberty Square eviction site.
This blatant disregard for First Amendment rights to freedom of speech, assembly and the press is highly disturbing, to say the least. But rather than dissuade demonstrators, concerned citizens and the media from carrying on or covering the ‘Occupy’ phenomenon, police-state tactics will only embolden and enlarge the movement. After all, it was after Americans saw images of civil rights and peace activists being savagely attacked by police in the 1960s that public opinion turned in favor of those movements.

The Bastard who Pepper Sprayed Kids at Occupy UC Davis

This is Lt. John Pike - He likes to Pepper Spray Kids when they are defenseless and in a sitting position. His information is Public, so Anonymous decided to share it for your enjoyment :)

http://anoncentral.tumblr.com/post/13023795840/d0x-uc-davis-pepper-spraying-officer-lt-john-pike



Lieutenant John Pike
Records Unit Manager
Phone: 530-752-3989
Cell: 530-979-0184
japikeiii@ucdavis.edu
Address: 4005 Cowell Blvd, Apt 616. Davis, CA 95618-6017
Skype: japike3
John A. Pike
POLICE LIEUTENANT - MSP
UC Davis

JOB TITLE

2010: POLICE LIEUTENANT - MSP
2009: POLICE LIEUTENANT - MSP
2008: POLICE LIEUTENANT - MSP

2010 PAY

Base pay: $116,454.00, Overtime: $0.00, Other:$0.00
Total pay: $110,243.12

2009 PAY

Base pay: $110,727.00, Overtime: $0.00, Other:$0.00
Total pay: $107,792.20

2008 PAY

Base pay: N/A, Overtime: $0.00, Other:$0.00
Total pay: $105,000.00
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/john-pike/18/a76/879
Pike has received 2  Meritorious Service Awards from UC Davis

File formal complaint against UC Davis police officer here: (pdf)

UC Davis Support Services Division
Contact Information:
Captain Joyce Souza
530-752-6202
Monday - Friday
8:00 AM to 5:00 PM
jxsouza@ucdavis.edu

Reporting a Crime or Accident
UC Davis Police Non-Emergency Service
(530) 752-1727

UC Office of the President
Mark G. Yudof
University of California
1111 Franklin St., 12th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607
Email: president@ucop.edu
Professor at the university, Nathan Brown, wrote an “open letter” calling on Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi to resign. The entire letter boldly condemns the Chancellor for permitting riot police to handle students as police did. (source)
UC Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi
Her response to the brutality
Offices of the Chancellor and Provost
Fifth floor, Mrak Hall
University of California, Davis
One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
(530) 752-2065
Contact form: http://chancellor.ucdavis.edu/contact.php
Katehi’s Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Linda-PB-Katehi/147754228574654

UC Davis FB Page: https://www.facebook.com/UCDavis

His boss, UCD Police Chief Annette Spicuzza, told the Davis Enterprise that she’s “very proud” of her officers. “I don’t believe any of our officers were hurt,” she says, “and I hope none of the students were injured.” (source)

UCD Police Chief Annette Spicuzza
(530) 752-3113
Salary: $125,000/yr
Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/annette-spicuzza/18/435/772

UC Davis Police Department 
One Shields Ave.
Davis, CA  95616
(530) 752-6823
FAX: (530) 752-3216

John Pike’s Education
California State University-Hayward (BS)
Activities and Societies: Theta Chi Fraternity
Submit a story to Theta Chi Fraternity
International Headquarters: 317-824-1881
http://www.thetachi.org
Theta Chi UC Davis Chapter: Zeta XI

California Penal Code Section 12403.7 (a) (8)
(g) Any person who uses tear gas or tear gas weapons except in self-defense is guilty of a public offense and is punishable byimprisonment in a state prison for 16 months, or two or three years or in a county jail not to exceed one year or by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment, except that, if the use is against a peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2, engaged in the performance of his or her official duties and the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a peace officer, the offense is punishable by imprisonment in a state prison for 16 months or two or three years or by a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment.
http://i1091.photobucket.com/albums/i398/99anon/Occupy6.jpg
Source: 99anon

78 Notes/ Show


Friday, November 18, 2011

Quote from The Frank Factor

CHRIS HEDGES: The banks and Wall Street, which have erected the corporate state to serve their interests at our expense, caused the financial crisis. The bankers and their lobbyists crafted tax havens that account for up to $1 trillion in tax revenue lost every decade. They rewrote tax laws so the nation's most profitable corporations, including Bank of America, could avoid paying any federal taxes. They engaged in massive fraud and deception that wiped out an estimated $40 trillion in global wealth. The banks are the ones that should be made to pay for the financial collapse.

The big banks and corporations are parasites. They greedily devour the entrails of the nation in a quest for profit, thrusting us all into serfdom and polluting and poisoning the ecosystem that sustains the human species. They have gobbled up more than a trillion dollars from the Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve and created tiny enclaves of wealth and privilege where corporate managers replicate the decadence of the Forbidden City and Versailles. Those outside the gates, however, struggle to find work and watch helplessly as food and commodity prices rocket upward...And no one in the Congress, the Obama White House, the courts or the press, all beholden to corporate money, will step in to stop or denounce the assault on families. Our ruling elite, including Barack Obama, are courtiers, shameless hedonists of power, who kneel before Wall Street and daily sell us out. The top corporate plutocrats are pulling down $900,000 an hour while one in four children depends on food stamps to eat.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Anarchy/Libertarianism

Freedom is not got by stepping out of the way of tyranny. "Anti-statism" is simply the act of lying naked and defenseless before any slavemaster that happens along. It advocates for collective action that is so weak and pussilanimous that protection of liberty becomes impossible. Anti-Statism encourages criminality by the powerful, and the victimization of everyone else, including the nearly-powerful.

It is the hypocritical Anarchist indeed that chooses a political path to influence a culture. The true lover of liberty will seek to light her flame among the thatches of society: what she seeks to burn down are the morals of her community.

The so called, “Free-Market Anarchist” is not an Anarchist at all. But rather, an Company Man. There is no logically consistent Anarchist way to argue that the company boss should be given unrestricted freedom, and his many workers, unending bondage. This is as oxymoronic as condemning hatred of hate itself as being, “hateful.”‌
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OTHER SHIT



Destroy the damned wall that seperates right from wrong. This is true liberty.

"Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told...Religion is doing what you told, no matter what is right..." - Anonymous


Let me issue and control a nations money and I care not who writes the laws.  Mayer Amschel Rothschild (Bauer)


Let there be no mistake, we shall have a one world government, wether or not we like it. The only question is wether world government will be achieved by conquest or concent.  (CFR) member James Warburg to the senate foreign relations committee 1950  


Today, Americans would be outraged in U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order (referring to the 1991 LA riot) Tommorow they will be grateful! this is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated that threatend our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing that every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by a one world government.  Dr Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger conference, Evians France 1991  


We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and kept their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we were indeed been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a one world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.  David Rockefeller to the trilateral commision June 1991  


In the very near future nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. When you think about it national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.  Strob Talbot Pres. Clinton's Deputy Sec. Of State July 20 1992  


The Trilateral Commision is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interest by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral represents a skillful, coordinated to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral commision intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of a one world system, they will in fact rule the future.U.S.   Senator Barry Goldwater 1964 


For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillary, he expolded that prepared ammunition in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.The UN is but a long range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful one-world revolutionaries hungry for profit and power. The depression was the calculated shearing of the public by the one world money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New york money market..... The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve bank.   Curtis Dall, FDR's Son in law  


The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies to create a one world government combining supercapitalism and communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? YES I DO! I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.  Congressman Larry P McDonald 1976, killed in the Korean airlines 747 shot down by the Soviets.


Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce  and manufacture, are very afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they greatly fear to speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.  Woodrew Wilson 1913. 


It is well that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe that there would be a revolution before morning. And that revolution would be based around the Federal Reserve, it is pure evil.Henry Ford. Be not fooled, depressions are carefully created by the elite both for practice and for greedy gain by a few.  Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh



“The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power...Among us today a concentration of private power without equal in history is growing.” Franklin D. Roosevelt



A free market economy can only exist until corporations find they can vote themselves money from the public treasury. That's been happening for a while now.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Simple Counterpoints for Simple Minds:

Simple Counterpoints for Simple Minds:

http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/economic-issues/54539-heres-great-quote-you-cannot-legislate-poor-into-prosperity.html

*You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity". 

You can, however, legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of wretched excess. The wealthy have been legislating us out of prosperity since reagan was elected.

No, you can't. Listen to yourself. You really think you can systematically redistribute wealth as a policy and expect continued productivity from the "wealthy"?

I think that the idea that the wealthy are the source of productivity is a myth. I think you have no problem with redistribution of wealth as long as it happens upwards instead of downward, which is, frankly, disgusting.

*What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

We have been working our asses off so corporate welfare cheats like helliburton can receive while doing as little as possible to earn.

*The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

See may last response. The politicians take out loans with our future earnings as collateral. You and I and many generations to come will pay back the principle and interest of the loans that our politicians took out to buy weapons and support services to fight wars on behalf of compound interest and natural resources.

*When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

1% control most of the wealth. They acquired it through very subtle methods of thievery that you idiots do not recognize; War for profit, tort reform (lawsuit abuse is not at crisis levels. Though common in retail it is virtually non-existent in manufacturing, refining and natural resource extraction.), union busting, subsidies for large companies that don't need them. There are probably millions of other ways. I will add them as they come to mind or are discovered.


*You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

Multiplication is not the objective. You republicans think that to "work" something has to turn a profit. FEMA, for example, works very well in providing assistance to those who have been victims of disasters but it doesn't turn a profit. It just redistributes wealth to those in need. A noble cause in my opinion. If you disagree then you go to hell.

Monday, October 3, 2011

OpEdNews - Article: Free Marketers Going After Occupy Wall Street --Danny Schechter

OpEdNews - Article: Free Marketers Going After Occupy Wall Street --Danny Schechter

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Free-Marketers-Going-After-by-Danny-Schechter-111003-235.html
--The right wing puts words in the mouths of protesters:
"It's all Wall Street's fault. Government needs
to write the wrongs of capitalism."

--Then offers this condescending take on the situation:
"Despite their honest intentions, many of the Occupy Wall Street protesters are being suckered into a trap and calling for the very "solutions" that are part of the financial elite's agenda to torpedo the American middle class – higher taxes and more big government. – Prison Planet lede via Drudge Report.

--Now they admit that Wall Street is PART of the problem but that there is a hidden hand above them.
"Of course," The Daily Bell whines, "Wall Street is PART of the problem, but it's a much larger problem, and Wall Street is ultimately, for the most part, a transactional mechanism. The issues of failing Western regulatory democracies and their eroding money stuff cannot simply be laid at the feet of the securities business, no matter how powerful it seems. The real controllers are to be seen elsewhere.

In the past these controllers have been able to effectively disguise their presence and influence. They do it by misdirection and by using money power to blame the private sector for the depredations of the West's central banking economy. The mainstream media is extremely important to this effort ..."

--Accuse the Protesters of being "CONTROLLED OPPOSITION"
"Now Occupy Wall Street evidently and obviously a dialectical enterprise funded by these same elites (at least in part) is giving them a moment of hope... "

--Again they emphasize the HIDDEN HAND behind it
"It is not bankers who have immense power, but central bankers and their controllers, the elite Anglosphere families that run central banking and distribute its tens of trillions of "money created from nothing."

http://plunderthecrimeofourtime.com/

Noam Chomsky - Deterring Democracy: Parenti explains CLASS perfectly

Noam Chomsky - Deterring Democracy: Parenti explains CLASS perfectly

MONDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2011

Parenti explains CLASS perfectly

Class Warfare Indeed

By Michael Parenti Monday, October 03, 2011

Over the last two decades or more, Republicans have been denouncing as "class warfare" any attempt at criticizing and restraining their mean one-sided system of capitalist financial expropriation.
The moneyed class in this country has been doing class warfare on our heads and on those who came before us for more than two centuries. But when we point that out, when we use terms like class warfare, class conflict, and class struggle to describe the system of exploitation we live under—our indictments are dismissed out of hand and denounced as Marxist ideological ranting, foul and divisive.
Amanda Gilson put it perfectly in a posting on my Facebook page: "[T]he concept of 'class warfare' has been hi-jacked by the wrong class (the ruling class). The wealthy have been waging war silently and inconspicuously against the middle and the poor classes for decades! Now that the middle and poor classes have begun to fight back, it is like, the rich want to try to call foul---the game was fine when they were the only ones playing it."
The reactionary rich always denied that they themselves were involved in class warfare. Indeed, they insisted no such thing existed in our harmonious prosperous society. Those of us who kept talking about the realities of class inequality and class exploitation were readily denounced. Such concepts were not tolerated and were readily dismissed as ideologically inspired.
In fact, class itself is something of a verboten word. In the mainstream media, in political life, and in academia, the use of the term "class" has long been frowned upon. You make your listeners uneasy ("Is the speaker a Marxist?"). If you talk about class exploitation and class inequity, you will likely not get far in your journalism career or in political life or in academia (especially in fields like political science and economics).
So instead of working class, we hear of "working families" or "blue collar" and "white collar employees". Instead of lower class we hear of "inner city poor" and "low-income elderly." Instead of the capitalist owning class, we hear of the "more affluent" or the "upper quintile." Don't take my word for it, just listen to any Obama speech. (Often Obama settles for an even more cozy and muted term: folks, as in "Folks are strugglin' along.")
"Class" is used with impunity and approval only when it has that magic neutralizing adjective "middle" attached to it. The middle class is an acceptable mainstream concept because it usually does not sharpen our sense of class struggle; it dilutes and muffles critical consciousness. If everyone in America is middle class (except for a few superrich and a minor stratum of very poor), there is little room for any awareness of class conflict.
That may be changing with the Great Recession and the sharp decline of the middle class (and decline of the more solvent elements of the working class). The concept of middle class no longer serves as a neutralizer when it itself becomes an undeniable victim.
"Class" is also allowed to be used with limited application when it is part of the holy trinity of race, gender, and class. Used in that way, it is reduced to a demographic trait related to life style, education level, and income level. In forty years of what was called "identity politics" and "culture wars," class as a concept was reduced to something of secondary importance. All sorts of "leftists" told us how we needed to think anew, how we had to realize that class was not as important as race or gender or culture.
I was one of those who thought these various concepts should not be treated as being mutually exclusive of each other. In fact, they are interactive. Thus racism and sexism have always proved functional for class oppression. Furthermore, I pointed out (and continue to point out), that in the social sciences and among those who see class as just another component of "identity politics," the concept of class is treated as nothing more than a set of demographic traits. But there is another definition of class that has been overlooked.
Class should also be seen as a social relationship relating to wealth and social power, involving a conflict of material interests between those who own and those who work for those who own. Without benefit of reason or research, this latter usage of class is often dismissed out of hand as "Marxist." The narrow reductionist mainstream view of class keeps us from seeing the extent of economic inequality and the severity of class exploitation in society, allowing many researchers and political commentators to mistakenly assume that U.S. society has no deep class divisions or class conflicts of interest.
We should think of class not primarily as a demographic trait but as a relationship to the means of production, as a relationship to power and wealth. Class as in slaveholder and slave, lord and serf, capitalist and worker. Class as in class conflict and class warfare.
And who knows, once we learn to talk about the realities of class power, we are on our way to talking critically about capitalism, another verboten word in the public realm. And once we start a critical discourse about capitalism, we will be vastly better prepared to act against it and defend our own democratic and communal interests.


Michael Parenti is an internationally known, award winning author and scholar. Included among his recent books are The Face of Imperialism (2011), Democracy for the Few 9th ed. (2011), and God and His Demons (2009).


Read more: http://chomsky-must-read.blogspot.com/2011/10/parenti-explains-class-perfectly.html#ixzz1ZjqK9yeS